Alternate
Sites
Many
in the community are concerned about adding more soccer or Little League
Baseball fields in the area. Our group
helped to locate additional sites that would be suitable for ball fields. We had a landscape architect check out the
open area at the Commons site. He established
that 2 fields, similar to the EBright plan would be
easily feasible at that location. Below
is a chart showing that the Commons site would be the better option.
Ebright Ball fields vs Commons Ball
Fields
Which is the better option?
|
|
Commons |
Ebright |
|
Larger size of fields |
ƒ |
|
|
Fewer # of large trees to cut |
ƒ (8) |
(54) |
|
Least impact to nature habitat for hawks, Song Birds and pilated wood peckers |
ƒ |
|
|
No impact to viable Salmon Creek |
ƒ |
|
|
No Encroachment on Wetland |
ƒ |
|
|
No Encroachment of Wetland Buffer |
ƒ |
|
|
No Encroachment on Creek Buffer |
ƒ |
|
|
No Flooding Concerns |
ƒ |
|
|
Greater Buffer to neighbors |
ƒ |
|
|
Best Noise Control (buffer and slope and size) |
ƒ |
|
|
Least Cost to Construct Fields |
ƒ |
|
|
Least Cost to Maintain Fields |
ƒ |
|
|
Road Access for Construction |
ƒ |
|
Prepared July 2003
Friends of